Web Content 2009

web.content09.125x125

A Conference Review

Everyone’s a critic when it comes to professional conferences—and why not? Most are terrible.

But that’s another post. I simply ask you count me as a confirmed skeptic (with a dash of hopeful idealist). Why? Because it’s the broader matter of knowledge exchange and professional growth that lies near and dear to my heart. And it’s always a pleasure to meet people in your profession doing surprising and good work.

Last week I was in Chicago, attending Web Content 2009. I was there at the generous invitation of Scott Abel, who is, along with Duo Consulting, the series co-founder and organizer. The event certainly won over this dour delegate in a few areas, and I’m hopeful you’ll get a sense why from this report.

Sidebar: What We Talk About When We Talk About Content

There is a genuine dearth of conferences speaking directly to the content specialist community.

There is a genuine dearth of conferences speaking directly to the content specialist community.

What we do have, by and large, splinter along the lines of related professional associations for the following audiences:

  • technical communicators;
  • content management professionals;
  • information management executives;
  • online marketers; and
  • user experience and interaction designers.

At this time, content strategy fields no such events, not even panels—which helps to explain its limited visibility in this mix.

Which is premature anyway, as there are leading practitioners in these adjacent fields whose work bears strongly upon our own. These are folks who, like Joe Pulizzi, are individually taking up the conversation around content strategy now, and will be our associates in helping communicate the message further afield. And they are, like Ann Rockley, the authors of some of the best books content strategists don’t study. Yet. (Due to a side project of my own, I have a tall pile of such texts I’m steadily plowing through this year.)

The chief value of Web Content 2009 was that it gave me a front-row opportunity to listen to and speak with a bevy of these folks, and to take a fresh accounting of their ideas in person.

An additional point in this event’s favor? It doesn’t stand in exclusively for any of the above stakeholder groups. Judging from its ’09 slate, it balances between the technical communications, content management and online marketing communities principally. And that counts as laudable diversity in the present conference landscape.

Highlights

Beyond Publishing: Exploring What We Are Really Doing With Web Content

Speaker: Joe Gollner

  • Gollner’s genial keynote kicked off the conference with a lightning history of the information sciences from the perspective of content.
  • He proved an adept guide, and while much of the information was pitched at a novice-level audience, it was an appropriate landscape perspective on the problems we face daily.
  • Those interested in this presentation would do well to read Glut by Alex Wright, a superb cultural history of information management.
  • [Abstract.]

Engineering Web Content: A Workshop in Two Parts

Speaker: Joe Gollner

  • Gollner used this workshop to frame his methodology as content engineering.
  • Which was more than lip service. The deck is a feast of info-dense slides and an altogether successful feat of extended metaphor: the applicability of engineering to content management. All that’s missing, alas, is his voiceover.
  • This is not for everyone. A colleague of mine, not in attendance, referred to this presentation as “bizarre” and I would agree in spirit—but it was the good-humored rigor of his thinking that shone through most in person.
  • [Abstract.]

Just Put That In The Zip Code Field…: The Ins and Outs of Content Modeling

Speaker: Deane Barker

  • This is an apt primer for anyone interested in content modeling, or in explaining it to others.
  • Chief takeaway: No less than requirements gathering, content modeling is a key exercise to undertake prior to CMS selection. Few organizations make the investment and pay for it later, handsomely.
  • Barker is an engaging speaker. His affection for content management clearly shows, much to his credit.
  • [Abstract.]

Who Put Video In My Content? Or How To Become A Video and Rich Media Superhero

Speaker: Todd O’Neill

  • O’Neill’s presentation surprised for not being as elementary and rote as I’d expected.
  • He exuded the experience of a seasoned practitioner. From strategic considerations of international deployment and bandwidth to shot composition, there was no limit to the level of detail he was interested in addressing, which is for me the hallmark of a great consultant.
  • I was struck time and again through his presentation by the applicability of his thinking to the video strategy work I’ve undertaken repeatedly for clientele. For someone looking for a subject matter expert in this area, O’Neill is a candidate.
  • It would be intriguing to see him present on a more focused topic in future, and to reflect on his own client work.
  • [Abstract.]

Building a Scalable XML-based Dynamic Delivery Architecture: Standards and Best Practices

Speaker: Jerry Silver

  • Silver brought serious chops to a commanding overview of and rationale for XML technologies.
  • He didn’t evangelize so much as communicate. He eschewed the hard sell.
  • He scrupulously demonstrated and supported his argument throughout with examples and observations on emerging best practices in the developer community.
  • [Abstract.]

Honorable Mentions

Needless to say, I was unable to take in a number of sessions from the dual-track program, but I should flag that:

  • Stewart Mader gave the most sublime sales pitch for wiki content imaginable;
  • Pulizzi made a candid plea for marketers to bring quality content to the table; and
  • To judge by Twitter and coffee break conversations, many of the most popular sessions were ones I didn’t attend.

All that and Rockley opined on why Canadians seem to comprise so much of the vanguard among content management consultants. (See also: SGML.)

Congratulations to all those involved with the conference.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr

Leave a Reply

  • “ He listened and learned as well as he spoke and advised and was really the archetype of what an effective consultant should be. ”

Notes on Content

A running report on must-read news, analysis and resources from the content landscape. Updated frequently. »

I say again, let us pay. Make the process as easy as possible. Make it invisible and transparent. Make us register once and once only. Walls are not the way forward, but walls are not the same thing as payment, and without some form of payment, the press will not be here in five years’ time. I hope one of the big organisations is working on this idea or something like it, because for print newspapers, the clock isn’t just ticking, it’s ticking louder and faster.

LRB · John Lanchester · Let Us Pay.

09.02.11 | Advertising & Marketing, Business Strategy, Industry Shift, Products & Services, Theory & Practice

SMM Tour from salty snack studios on Vimeo, via Submishmash: Submission Manager.

09.01.11 | Editorial & Programming, Organizational Dynamics, Products & Services, Technologies

via Flowing DataFormat and clean your data with Google Refine.

08.31.11 | Analytics & Search, Content Management, Launch/Relaunch, Products & Services

[M]ake a distinction between “formats” and “forms.” A hardback, a paperback, an audiobook, and many an ebook simply represent different forms of the same work. New formats, on the other hand, represent deeper changes in how authors develop content and readers consume it. The graphic novel is a recent format innovation in the West (albeit one with deep antecedents), as are the cell phone novels that have become popular in Japan.

via Tim O’Reilly, What lies ahead: Publishing – O’Reilly Radar.

08.30.11 | Emerging Media, Products & Services

 

Scarcity is not a viable business model on the Internet.

Fred Wilson, via Mathew Ingram, If an App Is Your Content Strategy, You Are Doomed: Tech News and Analysis «.

08.29.11 | Business Strategy, Content Strategy, Platforms & Channels, Social Media

The real loser here is the middle take. This is what the weeklies like Time and Newsweek have historically offered: reportage and essays produced a few days after major events, with a bit of analysis sprinkled on top. They’re neither fast enough to be conversational nor slow enough to be truly deep. The Internet has essentially demonstrated how unsatisfying that sort of thinking can be.

Clive Thompson on How Tweets and Texts Nurture In-Depth Analysis | Magazine.

08.26.11 | Editorial & Programming, Industry Shift, Social Media

via Suzanne, iPhone & iPad UX Reviews » Blog Archive » iPad UX Review: Flipboard vs. Pulse.

User Experience: Flipboard V Pulse

08.25.11 | Interaction Design & UX, Platforms & Channels, Products & Services

Some of this metadata is shared between both the collections management system and the DAM, but not all of it is in both. Each system has their own specific types of metadata. This sharing can even include the collections management system linking to the images in the DAM and not just data and vice versa (data to the images).

Content Technologies: DAM, CMS and Collections Management Systems – What’s the big dif? « Leala Abbott.

08.24.11 | Content Management, Technical Architecture, Technologies

Podcasting is an often overlooked corner of the media world [....] The iTunes store from Apple, where about 75 percent of the audience for podcasts looks for fresh material, contains about 150,000 regular shows featuring has-been and up-and-coming comics and sex talk, as well as mainstream fare like NPR and CNN broadcasts. Edison Research estimates that a quarter of all Americans over the age of 12 have listened to or watched at least one.

via Jon Kalish, Leo Laporte Builds Empire With ‘This Week in Tech’ – NYTimes.com.

08.23.11 | Content Specialists, Enterprise, Organizational Dynamics, Platforms & Channels

 

I would say that three elements of content strategy are essential: analysis, editorial, and architecture.

via Andrew Maier, Questioning Authority: Our interview with Colleen Jones, author of Clout | UX Booth.

08.22.11 | Content Specialists, Content Strategy

We have the ability to predict the performance of an article on the front page into the future—and empowered with that information we generate real-time recommendations on what articles to place where on the front page,” [Visual Revenue] CEO Dennis Mortensen wrote in a blog post.

Following Visual Revenue’s recommendations resulted in a 29 percent traffic boost for its nine beta publishers in November, Mortensen said in an email. If readers were reading an average of three stories on the homepage, for example, they started reading four.

via Adrianne Jeffries, Forget Real-Time, NY Startup Predicts Pageviews 15 Min Into the Future | The New York Observer.

08.19.11 | Analytics & Search, Editorial & Programming, Products & Services, Technologies

I think the thing that attracts me most to Vanilla is its simplicity and elegance. Sure, it is incredibly powerful however this is not at the expense of usability. The admin interface is beautifully designed and intuitive to use. You can add categories, manage users, send out announcements and indeed do everything else you would expect without any documentation or training. It’s just obvious.

via Paul BoagThe forum is dead, long live Vanilla « Boagworld.

08.18.11 | Interaction Design & UX, Products & Services, Resources

This content has been aggregated from external sources. Learn more about linkblogging and my use of it here. Authors, publishers and tipsters are welcome to contact me.