The Tao of Screen

In search of the distraction-free desktop.

If your computer desktop is anything like mine—and, brother, it is—you've paved over every spare pixel in an iconistan of clutter. Desktop design originated in a wistful visual metaphor, the clean, still work surface, encouraging users to productive ends. Leaps forward in computing horsepower and the rise of constant Internet use has transformed the tabletop terra firma into a cockpit, an antic terminal for the networked self. Our desktops are now a thick impasto of tabbed windows, pull-down menus, dashboard widgets, and application alerts. No possible distraction gets left behind, no link, feed, IM, tweet, or poke unheeded. [original_source] It's blindingly obvious to note that disarray is one of the defining aspects of the frequent Web user. (I could cite some pertinent statistics, but I don't trust myself to get back to this word processor window.) Ask any designer: Without white space, humans have difficulty focusing. Chances are, you're reading this alongside a flurry of other twinkling points of attention splayed across your monitor. But it doesn't have to be that way. There's an emerging market for programs that introduce much-needed traffic calming to our massively expanding desktops. The name for this genre of clutter-management software: zenware. [quote text="Our desktops are now a thick impasto of tabbed windows, pull-down menus, dashboard widgets, and application alerts. No possible distraction gets left behind, no link, feed, IM, tweet, or poke unheeded."] The philosophy behind zenware is to force the desktop back to its Platonic essence. There are several strategies for achieving this, but most rely on suppressing the visual elements you're used to: windows, icons, and toolbars. The applications themselves eschew pull-down menus or hide off-screen while you work. Even if you consider yourself inured to their presence, the theory goes, you'll benefit most from their absence. Zenware promises to help the ADHD user who lurks in each of us. But does any of this stuff actually work? As every freelance writer is a trusted authority on the powers of distraction, I decided to put a range of programs through the paces to see if they helped complete my daily computing tasks more punctually and efficiently. Deep within the steamer trunk of features in this fall's Mac OS X Leopard update is an innocuous-seeming application called Spaces that is designed to extend desktop real estate. The goal is to parcel your applications into task-specific groups. I use Spaces to divide my desktop into three areas: word processing, spreadsheets, and dashboard-type applications (e-mail, newsreader, and calendar), with each screen a quick keystroke away. (In a winningly antique way of transitioning between tasks, the screens shuttle across like a ball bouncing along a roulette wheel.)

Spaces for Mac OS X

I've found this approach to screen expansion—making more with less—works nicely, acting as a natural encouragement to concentration and organization. Deep-surfing RSS feeds is my most frequent vice. With this system, when I start reading something I know will blow away my five-minute break, I click to minimize it to my dock for retrieval later. Rather than indulge my worst surfing habits, Spaces encourages fastidiousness. Every time I use Spaces, though, I'm forced to remember VirtueDesktops, an antecedent application for the Mac that allowed a greater range of configurability. (As old-school Unix and newer Windows users can crow, virtual desktops have been around the PC market for years.) The most common zenware programs are the mini-apps that act to quiet the desktop in tiny ways. Widely available for PC or Macintosh, they variously dim the menu bar, highlight or isolate an active window, darken an inactive one, or minimize inactive applications completely. Most of these are niche-marketed to microscopic groups with particular screen annoyances; in combination, they are all a bit much. WriteRoomIn trying out these various widgets, I learned that some zenware holds unexpected benefits. One program I tried, called Spirited Away—the PC equivalent is Swept Away—works by automatically hiding any program that's been sitting on your screen unused. Unfortunately, this feature assumes that you're always staying on task. If you get distracted and, say, start surfing RSS feeds, the pressing tasks that you're supposed to be working on drift away to help you focus on your procrastination. Even so, I've stuck with Spirited Away because it enforces a happy habit: alertness to the task at hand. If one of my important windows disappears, I know it's time to start working again. If the word processors WriteRoom (Mac) and DarkRoom (PC) are any indication, the virtues of the zenware approach shine brightest when it comes to full applications. Almost immediately upon starting up WriteRoom, I felt a kind of aesthetic arousal normal people reserve for, say, tattoos or kung fu movies. Part of this is nostalgia, as WriteRoom tosses its user into a monochrome void that's lit only by the blinking green cursor. But the true charm here is the configurability of the user interface, which allows you to craft an ideal composition space. The key is that, unlike in Word, the choices are kept shrewdly off-screen: WriteRoom's blank slate reduces the urge to twiddle with margins and other formatting gewgaws. Instead, I find myself forgoing cosmetic changes for more functional ones, like bumping up the type size when my office window light starts to falter. Unlike practically everything else in our digital lives, WriteRoom's minimalist interface implies a truly flattering proposition: It's you, not the software, that matters. After repeated use, I found a pure joy in writing that my computer mainstays—from basic notepad apps to Word—had siphoned away years before. Part of this could be novelty, so I'm remaining cautious. I can't quite say it's made me a better writer, but then neither can any technology. But WriteRoom has me composing more quickly, and it's brought back the elemental thrill of assembling thoughts by tossing words onto the screen. As outrageous and premature as it sounds, programs like WriteRoom could have the kind of impact for this generation that The Elements of Style had for another, by distilling down the writing process and laying bare its constituent parts. A little screen simplification can go a long way. For those keeping score, the computer is supposed to be the thing with the electrical plug, not the wired drone operating it. So try dialing down the Twittering itch for a moment and see where it leads you. The pundits have told us about the dangers of info glut and data smog, how our screens are accumulating noisy riots of data. But with zenware, the cure is right at hand—for those who really want it.
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Leave a Reply

  • We're a content strategy agency and think tank for digital publishers.


    Expertise

    We know content.

    We bring a product development approach to your content offering, making it work for you in ways you didn't think possible.

    We know editorial.

    Everyone's a publisher online. So welcome to the multi-channel, multi-platform content landscape. We develop your strategy, your platform and your team.

    Team

    Jeffrey MacIntyre, Principal

    A noted content strategy consultant with 10 years’ experience in professional services and digital, print and broadcast media, Jeff has worked with premier media properties and design agencies.

    A partner network of the best industry specialists in content.

    Predicate pairs with experts in their respective fields, fitting talent to need. CMS architects. Metadata gurus. Visual designers. Business analysts.

    Notes on Content

    What we're blogging:

    [category_cloud]
  • Community
    Referrals Available
    Referral request » We’re plugged into a rapidly growing network of content specialists. We might know just the expert you need. Predicate would be pleased to refer you to one of our community partners.
    Wikipedia on Content Strategy
    Wikipedia.org » See how the Wikipedia community is now defining content strategy.
    The Knol
    knol.google.com » An ongoing joint effort to define the area of practice and its practitioners.
    Twitter Community
    #contentstrategy » Follow the content strategy community on Twitter with #contentstrategy.
    LinkedIn Group
    Content Strategy » The original content strategy community group on LinkedIn.
    Doxycycline 100mg

    Content Strategy Google Group » Doxycycline 100mg, A hotbed of conversation. Vibramycin medication. Doxycycline vibramycin. Comprare vibramycin online. Vibramycin medication. Doxycycline vibramycin. Vibramycin dose. Vibramycin uses. Generic vibramycin. Vibramycin doxycycline. Vibramycin for cats. Vibramycin suspension. Vibramycin dosage. Vibramycin chlamydia. Vibramycin hyclate. Order vibramycin. Vibramycin doxycycline hyclate. Vibramycin drug. Vibramycin syrup. Vibramycin tablets. Comprare vibramycin online. Vibramycin dose. Vibramycin tablets. Vibramycin medication. Doxycycline vibramycin. Vibramycin for cats.

    Similar posts: Bactrim buy. Augmentin 625 mg. Buy keflex online. Bactrim ds tablets. Keflex 500 mg side effects. Augmentin 875 mg tablets.
    Trackbacks from: Doxycycline 100mg. Doxycycline 100mg. Doxycycline 100mg. Doxycycline 100mg. Doxycycline 100mg. Doxycycline 100mg.

    Meetup Groups
    Meetup groups worldwide » Over a dozen groups internationally. Membership in the thousands. And growing. Content Strategy NYC » The local area meetup group for content specialists in New York.
  • “ He was the ideal bridge between print-oriented newspaper people, like myself, and the new (and sometimes scary) world of the web. ”

Notes on Content

A running report on must-read news, analysis and resources from the content industry. Updated frequently. »

via Alexis MadrigalThe 5 Keys to Tumblr for Media Outlets - Science and Tech - The Atlantic.

Tumblr Guide for Media Outlets

09.03.10 | Platforms & Channels

[O]ne could easily use Drupal's built-in user access controls, content types, and taxonomy capabilities to create a simple style guide involving several contributors. For different or specific functionality, you could even use book features or add wiki-like behaviors with other modules. We did something similar to this with our own firm handbook; it's meant as a collaborative repository of Digett's own policies and procedures. Our own style requirements—few as they may be—could easily be included, if I ever get tired of housing them in my own noggin.
via Where are all the Web-Based Style Guides? | Digett.

09.02.10 | Content Management, Editorial & Programming

About Earth-Touch.com

09.01.10 | Custom & Branded Content, Platforms & Channels, Products & Services

Whether on the supply side of content and applications, or on the distribution and run-time side of the equation, what is abundantly clear is that reach is still king. For platform makers, these battles will continue as they all seek to drive sufficient reach for their open and proprietary standards such that they can exploit this distribution for their core commercial goals. Likewise, and more important, whatever standards and models deliver the broadest reach will ultimately drive what is adopted by publishers, developers and ISVs.
via Jeremy AllaireThe Future of Web Content – HTML5, Flash & Mobile Apps | TechCrunch.

08.31.10 | Business Strategy, Content Specialists, Platforms & Channels, Video

via Leen Jones, Time & Our Focus on Content « Winning Content.

Viewing Content in Time

08.30.10 | Content Strategy, Organizational Effectiveness

via Patrick Burgoyne, Creative Review - Distill on your iPhone

08.27.10 | Launch/Relaunch, Platforms & Channels, Products & Services

 
I read lots of articles from mainstream media but I don't go to mainstream media directly to read it. It comes to me […]. More and more people are choosing social filters for their news rather than professional filters. We're tuning out television news, we're tuning out newspapers. And we still hear about the important stuff […]. It's news that matters. I figure by the time something gets to me it's been vetted by those I trust. via Henry Blodget, Chris Anderson's Unbelievably Annoying Interview with Spiegel

08.26.10 | Emerging Media, Industry Shift, Platforms & Channels, Social Media

Infographics Gallery | Information Graphics Designs | Data Visualization - Style & Flow.

Infographics Gallery

08.25.10 | Resources

I can tell you how I’d like to work with a content strategist as co-designers. I need you, Content Strategist Person, to tell me the following 10 things about content: 1. Range of priorities: The range of priorities within a given content type. For example, is every press release going to be equally important (or unimportant), or is there a big spread between the most important and the least important press release? 2. Algorithmic prioritization: Whether the relative priority among its peers can be determined by a rule, or if a human needs to decide. That is, given a set of five press releases, is there a rule I can reliably apply that will prioritize them? (For example: release date.) 3. Inherent prioritization: Whether there is an inherent prioritization between content types. That is, is every press release going to be more important than every white paper? 4. Plans for growth: The organization’s plans for growing or changing the content. 5. Level of effort: The complexity of the production process for each content type. Which content is hard to produce? Which content is easy to produce? Which content can I count on to always be up-to-date? Which content should be prioritized when it appears, and otherwise remain in the background? 6. Metadata authoring: The organization’s capacity for applying metadata, and what’s realistic in terms of populating a metadata framework. We’ll have lots of good ideas on how to link content together, but those ideas probably won’t work unless we understand the organization’s ability to tag the content. 7. Metadata parameters: Parameters for different metadata fields. As we’re designing wireframes, let’s be smart about how much text we need to display. 8. User needs: The need for transparency to the users about some of the underlying structures. How much do users care about content type? Help me distinguish administrative metadata from metadata that actually contributes to findability. 9. Users needs (2): How the content fits into user scenarios. Is this transient content (stuff just to get them just to the next step) or destination content? How will people use the content once they find it? What are you doing to align the content with requirements specified in personas or elsewhere? 10. Sample content: Finally, if you want me to put sample content in my wireframes, I’m totally game. Just give me the sample content. via Dan Brown, Letter to a Content Strategist « Greenonions.

08.24.10 | Content Strategy, Interaction Design, Organizational Effectiveness

“At this point it was a huge Excel spreadsheet,” says Schmitt. “For some weird reason, the data started in January of ‘04 and it ended in like April of ’09. And we couldn’t figure out why does it end there? Assange later comes and says it doesn’t end there—you just gotta open up a new screen or whatever… It was clear that we were going to need some technical assistance”.
via Clint Hendler, The Story Behind the Publication of WikiLeaks’s Afghanistan Logs : CJR.

08.23.10 | Editorial & Programming

via David Hobbs, 3 Step Check for New CMS.

08.20.10 | Content Management

via Richard Ingram, Get a firm grip of your web content –  on Flickr.

Get a Firm Grip of Your Web Content

08.19.10 | Content Management, Content Strategy

This content has been aggregated from external sources. Learn more about linkblogging and my use of it here. Authors, publishers and tipsters are welcome to contact me.