Posted 09.14.09 | Filed under: Content Management, Theory & Practice
Evaluating CMS Implementations
1. Expectation rationality. Too many projects are doomed from the start because the expectations were set too high. It is often useful to have a third party assess whether the project was oversold or if it under-delivered.
2. Platform suitability. Choosing the wrong CMS product also puts the project in jeopardy. The platform should support your requirements, feel intuitive to your users, be maintainable by your team, and be supported by a well run company that can be a compatible partner.
3. Project execution. The project to implement the solution should be appropriately scoped and phased to achieve short term results quickly and work toward long term goals. You need to select a competent integration partner internal or external that you can trust and collaborate with to make good decisions. Your users need to be well supported with training and coaching.
via Seth Gottlieb, Dimensions of Success or Ways to Fail « Content Here.
This content has been aggregated from external sources. Learn more about linkblogging and my use of it here. Authors, publishers and tipsters are welcome to contact me.
Leave a Reply
Predicate is a New York-based content strategy practice for digital publishers.
Learn More About Predicate
An introduction to what Predicate does—and to the emerging field of content strategy.
Notes on Content
Topics covered:
Platforms & Channels Launch/Relaunch Emerging Media Content Management Industry Events User-Generated Content Resources Theory & Practice Interaction Design & UX Advertising & Marketing Industry Shift Products & Services IP & Legal Content Specialists Technologies Business Strategy Video Editorial & Programming Agencies Technical Architecture Enterprise Organizational Dynamics Custom & Branded Content Analytics & Search Content Strategy Social Media
-
“ Jeff implemented the most strategic and practical online editorial program for a client [...] streamlining and perfecting their workflow through his unique perspective on online publishing, and [his] years of experience dealing with some of the most complex editorial programs online. ”









