Posted 08.14.09 | Filed under: Content Management, Theory & Practice
CMS Evaluations: Against Scoring
If you’ve created an elaborate criteria driven scoring system, it will inevitably be time-consuming to read each long proposal. Naturally, usability is critical, but how will you score it? And how about intangibles, such as having a local office. The answer to that is either a yes or a no, so how will that count?
via Janus Boye, » No scoring methodology for CMS selections – J. Boye » Blog.
After collecting requirements, the second most difficult component of a CMS selection is taking all the information that was gathered during the evaluation phase and using it to make a decision. This is where people get crazy with spreadsheets and scoring in the hopes that math will somehow heroically make a complicated and confusing (and, lets face it, subjective) decision obvious and irrefutable.
via Seth Gottlieb, Doubt « Content Here.
Bonus link: Check out this great template on a suggested RFP email template.
This content has been aggregated from external sources. Learn more about linkblogging and my use of it here. Authors, publishers and tipsters are welcome to contact me.
Leave a Reply
Predicate is a New York-based content strategy practice for digital publishers.
Learn More About Predicate
An introduction to what Predicate does—and to the emerging field of content strategy.
Notes on Content
Topics covered:
Platforms & Channels User-Generated Content Editorial & Programming IP & Legal Technical Architecture Custom & Branded Content Agencies Content Management Interaction Design & UX Content Specialists Technologies Enterprise Social Media Analytics & Search Launch/Relaunch Products & Services Emerging Media Theory & Practice Video Organizational Dynamics Industry Events Industry Shift Resources Business Strategy Content Strategy Advertising & Marketing
-
“ He developed the strategy [...] and then implemented it not just efficiently but also to a very, very high standard[.] ”









