A running report on must-read news, analysis and resources from the content industry. Updated constantly. »
Privately, some within Google maintain that it is not their fault if media companies cannot monetise the traffic they are being sent by the search engine. Media companies need to become far better at exploiting their digital inventory.
Google’s Josh Cohen: Publishers Still Need Us | paidContent.
On-site traffic is all well and good, but there’s also value in joining the ranks of publishers syndicating through partners.
By next summer, according to founder and CEO Richard Rosenblatt, Demand will be publishing 1 million items a month, the equivalent of four English-language Wikipedias a year. Demand is already one of the largest suppliers of content to YouTube, where its 170,000 videos make up more than twice the content of CBS, the Associated Press, Al Jazeera English, Universal Music Group, CollegeHumor, and Soulja Boy combined.
via Dan Roth, The Answer Factory: Fast, Disposable, and Profitable as Hell | Magazine.

“The added traffic comes from two sources, the first is the added video views created by adding discovered video to the site, which accounts for 40 percent of video plays,” said New York general manager Michael Silberman in the release. “The second source of traffic is from videos produced by NYmag.com; this is the hidden benefit of Magnify’s platform—it creates significant and measurable value.”
Not to put too fine a point on it, but on one level demand creation is about art, while demand fulfillment is about math. There is so much data online that it is often hard to get beyond the math. The data is incredibly important and always will be. The data will indeed make digital advertising more effective—but only if we can maintain a place in the new world order for the art as well.
via Jim Spanfeller, Click Fix: How Digital Advertising Can Get Its Game Back | paidContent.
Economist.com is preparing to make significant changes to its brand strategy.
“An individual content item on the web, without a package, has marginal value approaching zero — and attempting to charge for an individual item of content is unlikely to change that. What you CAN charge for is the package. Media companies need to be doing what Google is doing — experimenting with new ways to package content, which in a digital-media world means new UIs and new ways to aggregate.”
Scott Karp, Inside Word: For Media Companies, The ‘Package’ Is More Important Than The Contents | paidContent.
“Whoever defines the interface wins.”
via The Time Inc./Condé Supergroup Conundrum – Bill Mickey – Blogs emedia and Technology @ FolioMag.com.
See more here:
Traditional publishers — concerned that Apple’s anticipated tablet computer could affect their business the way the iPod disempowered music publishers — are discussing possible strategies, including an industry-wide digital storefront where tablet users could buy digital issues or subscriptions without going through iTunes or the App Store.
via Apple Tablet: Magazine Industry Eyes ITunes for Print – Advertising Age – MediaWorks.
Earlier this year, Time Inc. CEO Ann Moore tasked her lieutenant John Squires with figuring out how to put the digital “genie back in the bottle”. Here’s part of his answer: A Hulu for magazines.
The opportunity seems to be bigger for B2B than B2C content, but operators of the websites of the Wall Street Journal and Financial Times already knew that.
via Reflections of a Newsosaur: How to sell news on the web: A checklist.
This content has been aggregated from external sources. Learn more about linkblogging and my use of it here. Authors, publishers and tipsters are welcome to contact me.